|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
©2008 AirBorn
|
Selecting your Electronics Design HouseElectronics design is relatively one of the less expensive parts of custom design & engineering work. The cost of basic design work for an electronics prototype can sometimes be less than enclosure design and tooling costs, if the unit has a plastic injection moulded case. Having said this, all the good electronics design staff cost real money - the client is paying for the expertise and experience that the designer has to offer.
It is quite possible to contract and employ an Electronic Designer without being especially knowledgeable in electronics. Insist on understanding the principles involved, even if not the precise details of operation. Experience demonstrates that there are two breeds of design engineers - the desirable type are fountains of information, the undesirable types hide information to make themselves indispensable. If you employ a "Closed-Book" engineer, you will find it difficult to ever un-employ him. While there are occasionally valid reasons, practices which highlight an undesirable engineer or design house are:
The last item deserves a short comment. In the field of Cryptology, "Security through Obscurity" is widely questioned as a principle. Most such systems have proven to be poorly designed. Perhaps the best model is the 20 Year old Data Encryption Standard (DES). Complete details of DES operation have been available since its release - for 20 years it was algorithmically secure. As of 17 July 1998 brute force attacks have been developed that can crack a ciphertext-plaintext pair in about 56 hours - but that is not actually a failure of the algorithm, DES has stood the test of time brilliantly. For security choose algorithm or patent - not obscurity.
Electronic Design houses can be found in the Yellow Pages under Electronic Engineers, on the internet [You've found one
In Selecting your design house, use these criteria:
Normally you would start with a list of subcontractors, rank them according to your criteria, and then contact each about your project. This may involve email, but would usually involve a phone call as well. Keep the information provided brief, but not deceptive. Avoid sending a subcontractor a 100 page document and asking for his feedback - you may be astounded by the silence!
From the responses, and based on your ranking, you should pick a short list. Each of these you would email or call again, with a little more information, and ask for an estimate. A large amount of effort is required in the initial stages of a design project, both for client and design house, in examining the spec, ratifying the clauses and arriving at estimated production costs.
If the job is large, it is pretty normal to consider two or three subcontractors for the same job to the estimate stage, but it is unusual to have two or more design houses produce competing quotes for the same job without paying them a "feasibility study" fee. (Ballpark estimates are a different matter) Normally the selection process has narrowed the field to one favourite before the specification is worked through in great detail.
When choosing a design subcontractor, be wary, also, of "trying a small job first". Every project should be considered on its own merits. If the client has difficulty establishing that the design house can reliably complete the larger project, completing a smaller task first does not really alter the situation, - credibility should be established by references and examples of past work. In "trying a small job first" the client might even find the nature (or size) of the project causes the design house to underperform by lowering the projects priority, - when a job is important to a client, it rubs off on the sub-contractors.
The "outsource" or "inhouse" argument for engineering is as old as the design process itself. I think my most useful contribution would be to say that the decision really should be based on availability of inhouse staff. If you have the inhouse staff, uncommitted, and if they can can complete the project efficiently then don't outsource the work. One caveat: Consider the big picture, - when you outsource you quite often get greater control over costs and risk, because they get quantified up front. When you operate inhouse some portions of the project cost will be invisible - if your project goes over budget, it is unlikely you will remember that 'Fred' didn't answer customer calls because he was working hard on finishing the new circuit board. These comments are provided in good faith, and represent the opinions of Steven Murray, manager, AirBorn Electronics. The comments highlight a useful method for selecting an
The paper burns, but the words fly away.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||